Career
Contact
Shop
Language switcher
EN
EN DE SV ZH
Language switcher
EN
EN DE SV ZH

Chefs

Cow
0E9A0516 Force broth with spinach ravioli.RDB

Chef Recipes

Top chefs from the best restaurants will show you unique creations with QimiQ.

Learn more
Obauer Brothers chill standing chain between them

Chef Videos

Find out why top chefs like Leon Amon, Karl & Rudi Obauer, Hans Mandl, Hans Peter Fink or Andreas Kaiblinger use QimiQ.

Learn more
Beetroot Panna Cotta

Chef's special Holiday Menus

Very special creations for the most beautiful days of the year.

Learn more
Imprint Privacy statement

Data protection

We, QimiQ Handels GmbH (Headquarters: Austria), would like to process personal data with external services. This is not necessary for the use of the website, but allows us to interact with you even more closely. If desired, please make a selection:

Google Analytics

Google LLC, USA

Purpose: Error analysis, statistical evaluation of our website

Processing operations: Collection of connection data, data of your web browser and data about the content accessed; execution of analysis software and storage of data on your end device, Anonymisation of the collected data; evaluation of the anonymous data in the form of statistics.

Storage period: data on their end device for up to two years.

Joint Responsible Officer: Google LLC, AmphitheatreParkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA

Legal basis for data processing: Voluntary consent, revocable at any time

Consequences of non-consent: No direct effect on the function of the website; however Limited possibilities for further development and error analysis

Legal basis for data transfer to the USA: The legal basis for the data transfer to the USA is your consent pursuant to Art. 49 (1) lit a in conjunction with Art. 6 (1) lit a DSGVO. The USA does not have a level of data protection that corresponds to the standards of the EU. In particular, US intelligence services can access your data without you being informed and without you being able to take legal legal action against this. For this reason, the ECJ has ruled that the previous adequacy decision is invalid. invalid.